Spring til...

  • Hovedindhold
  • Indholdsfortegnelse
  • Sidefod
  • Dansk da
Scientific article APR 2025
  • Economy and Governance
  • Economy and Governance

Ranking Public Expenditure Programs

Authors:

  • Mathilde Almlund
  • Torben M. Andersen
  • Economy and Governance
  • Economy and Governance
Download
Download
The marginal value of public funds (MVPF) has been proposed as a criterion for choosing between social programs, but its appropriateness has been debated. In this paper, we show the MVPF is indeed providing the correct ranking when deciding on marginal increases in net spending, but it is not a valid criterion for selecting policies on which to increase marginal up front spending. In this case, the correct criterion is the Marginal Net Social Benefit (MNSB). This distinction is crucial for policymakers who operate under a fixed up front budget. We demonstrate that previous arguments in favor of the opposite conclusion rely on implicit assumptions of constant returns to scale.

Authors

  • Mathilde AlmlundTorben M. Andersen

About this publication

  • Published in

    Economics Letters
VIVE – The Danish Centre for Social Science Research provides knowledge that contributes to developing the welfare society and strengthening quality development, efficiency enhancement and governance in the public sector, both in municipalities, regions and nationally.
Tel: +45 44 45 55 00
E-mail: vive@vive.dk
EAN: 5798000354845
CVR: 23 15 51 17